The American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation (ASHFoundation) invites new investigators to submit proposals in competition for one $10,000 grant underwritten by an endowment fund in memory of the late Dennis Klatt, noted researcher and scientist in speech communication. Until his death in 1989, Dr. Klatt conducted research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on the acoustic properties of speech production and perception.
The Speech Science Research Grant is designed to further research activities of new investigators and to promote Dr. Klatt's work. It can be used to initiate new research or supplement an existing research study. Funds may be requested for a variety of purposes—for example, equipment, subjects, research assistants, or research-related travel.
Note for 2018: In preparation for the grant submission and review processes, the ASHFoundation requests that potential investigators complete an Intent to Submit Form to provide information regarding their proposed studies. When investigators log in to the online submission system, they will be prompted to complete the Intent to Submit Form. This step must be completed before proceeding to the proposal submission process.
Investigators must meet the following criteria to be eligible for the Speech Science Research Grant.
- The investigator must have completed a PhD or equivalent research doctorate within the past five years (since 2013).
- The proposal must be for research in speech science, although the investigator's field of degree is unrestricted. Priority will be given to areas reflecting Dr. Klatt's broad interests, such as speech perception, synthesis, and acoustics, with an emphasis on an interdisciplinary research approach.
- There are no restrictions on prior or simultaneous funding.
- The proposal submitted to the 2018 Speech Science Research Grant competition cannot be submitted to other 2018 ASHFoundation grant competitions. However, the investigator remains eligible to submit to other ASHFoundation grant competitions in the same year, if proposing to investigate a different topic.
A review panel will evaluate the proposals based on the following five criteria:
- Significance: The potential for the study to advance the knowledge base in speech science and to impact clinical needs relevant to audiology or speech-language pathology.
- Approach: The merits of the design for accomplishing the specific aims of the study and, if applicable, the potential challenges of moving the study toward completion. The appropriateness and feasibility of a detailed account of the method, including measurement and data-analysis plans, will be considered relative to the award size.
- Investigator: The perceived ability to carry out the study in the specified time period, reflected by appropriate training, experience, and past accomplishments. The investigator outlines clear and detailed management and budget plans.
- Environment: The extent to which the investigator has access to needed scientific facilities, resources, personnel, and subjects.
- Innovation: The refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, methods, or interventions.
Reviewers will assign scores on a 1–9 scale for each criterion, as well as an Overall Impact score based on all five criteria. The Overall Impact score tends to reflect reviewers' assessment of whether the proposed study will be completed competently, be disseminated appropriately, will advance the investigator's research program for future funding, and has the potential to impact the discipline.
The five criteria contribute differentially to the Overall Impact score to correspond to the goals and funding level of the grant competition. A tightly designed, feasible study is most appropriate for the Speech Science Research Grant competition.
Because this grant is meant for new investigators and for studies in speech science, the Approach criterion would be more heavily weighted than the Innovation criterion. The promise of the Investigator will be highly prioritized, but will be evaluated in comparison to other new researchers in the discipline based on the investigator's ability to clearly describe the activities and timeline necessary to complete the study in one year.
Proposal text should be single-spaced and placed in ONE PDF document containing all required sections in the order indicated. Additional attachments will not be accepted. Please use stated titles (below) as section headers. Selected font should be 12 point and uncondensed, and margins should be at least 1 inch.
- Investigator Letter (limit 2 pages)
Provide a letter of application addressed to the "Grant Review Committee." Explain briefly why you are pursuing the proposed study, the specific aims of the proposed research, and how the study fits into your career development plan. Include, as appropriate, information relative to your research interests and activities to date. Specifically indicate how your institution will support your research efforts. (Please note that this letter is not intended to be a replication of the detailed investigator biographical sketch.)
If this proposal is a revision of a prior submission to the ASHFoundation, the Investigator Letter must address how the proposal has been revised to respond to the prior set of reviews.
- Abstract (limit 1 page)
Concisely describe the study's specific aims, methodology, and long-term objectives, making reference to the scientific disciplines involved. Relate the study to clinical practice and its potential impact on communication sciences and disorders.
- Research Plan (limit 10 pages)
Note: If the request is to supplement an existing research study, sections A through D in the Research Plan may be adapted and shortened accordingly and the optional section E should be included.
Specific Aims: Present the problem or issue to be addressed and objectives of the proposed study. Include research questions and/or hypotheses.
Significance of Research: Outline the significance of the existing need and the importance of the proposed study in understanding, remediating, or compensating for the problem. Address the potential impact of the study’s activities on the discipline of communication sciences and disorders.
Design Methods, Procedures, and Evaluation: Provide both a description and a justification for the study design, including subjects, measurement techniques, instrumentation, data analysis, and evaluation procedures. Address ecological validity, if the type of research warrants this. Address potential challenges that could impact completion of the study. This section should provide enough detail for reviewers to make informed judgments about the soundness of the proposed research procedures.
Facilities and Resources: Describe the facilities, resources, personnel, and subjects available to you for carrying out the proposed study.
Importance of Request to Research Plan (optional): If the funds requested are to supplement existing research, describe how the funds will enhance the study.
- References (limit 2 pages)
- Management Plan and Budget (limit 2 pages)
Provide an outline of study activities and timelines. Incorporate ASHFoundation report deadlines into the management timeline. Justify budget items for direct expenses. Institutional overhead and indirect costs are not covered due to the size of the grant. In addition, funding may not be directed to travel expenses for conventions or meetings. Funding will be disbursed in U.S. currency to investigators in the United States or Canada.
- Biographical Sketch (limit 5 pages)
Complete an NIH-style biographical sketch. A form and sample are available on the NIH website [DOC]. Adapt the form as appropriate for the investigator profile; however, at minimum, section headers must include Education/Training, Positions and Honors, Contribution to Science, and Research Support.
- Human Subjects
If the study will use human participants, include the consent form(s) and copy of the Institutional Review Board’s (IRB) approval.
If the IRB approval is not available at time of proposal submission, you should clearly explain the status of the IRB approval process and ensure that approval documents are sent to the ASHFoundation as soon as IRB approval is granted, but not later than August 31, 2018.
It is essential to start the IRB approval process early. A lack of IRB determination by August 31, 2018, will automatically disqualify the proposal from funding consideration. The investigator assumes full responsibility for meeting these requirements.
If the IRB approval will not be available until the deadline of August 31, 2018, the investigator should provide the following information (limit 3 pages):
- Describe the characteristics of the participant population, including the anticipated number, age range, gender, ethnic background, and health status.
- Identify sources of research materials in the form of specimens, records, and/or data.
- Describe plans for the recruitment of participants and the consent procedures to be followed (include copy of consent form to be used).
- Describe the potential risks to participants (e.g., physical, psychological, social, legal, or other).
- Describe the procedures for protecting against or minimizing potential risks to participants, including risks to confidentiality.
- Discuss why risks to participants are reasonable in relation to the anticipated benefits and to the importance possible resulting knowledge.
- Letter of Institutional Commitment
Submit a letter addressed to the "Grant Review Committee" from your current supervisor in your employment setting indicating that the study is endorsed and will not present a conflict of interest with your current responsibilities and commitments.
- Letters of Support (optional)
If applicable, provide letters of support from cooperating agencies and key personnel (i.e., other collaborators and consultants) involved in the research study.